Reductio ad absurdum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
Reductio ad absurdum is a rhetorical technique used to show the logical consequences of an argument or claim by taking it to an extreme and often ridiculous conclusion. T
he purpose of this fallacy is to demonstrate that the original argument or claim leads to an absurd or unreasonable outcome, thus undermining its validity.
Here’s how it typically works:
- An argument or claim is presented.
- To challenge the validity of that argument, someone uses a reductio ad absurdum by taking the argument to an extreme and absurd conclusion.
- The absurd conclusion is then used to suggest that the original argument must be flawed or incorrect because it leads to such an unreasonable outcome.
Is this a fallacy?
It can be a valid form of argumentation when used appropriately, but can also be fallacy when the extreme example does not accurately represent the original argument or its logical consequences.
In a logical debate, it’s crucial to ensure that the absurd conclusion drawn from the reductio ad absurdum accurately reflects the implications of the initial argument.